Abstract
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs), basically rolled graphene sheets, have been studied lately as oil additives in the literature. However, we observed discrepant impact of CNTs on wear protection from two common tribological tests, four-ball unidirectional sliding and high frequency reciprocating rig (HFRR) ball-on-flat reciprocating sliding. To gain a stable suspension and dispersion of the CNTs in the oil, the CNT surface was functionalized with a phenyl ligand and a dispersant, polyisobutylene succinimide (PIBSI), was added. In the four-ball test, PIBSI alone failed to protect the surface but the CNTs effectively reduced the wear loss. The observations in the HFRR test however were the opposite: the PIBSI alone provided strong wear reduction but the CNTs had no positive impact. Such a discrepancy was hypothetically attributed to the different wear protection mechanisms by the PIBSI and CNTs which responded distinctively under different testing conditions. Additional unidirectional and reciprocating sliding tests with matching Hertzian contact pressures were able to validate the hypothesis. Worn surface morphological examination and tribofilm chemical analysis further supported the proposed wear mechanisms. Fundamental understanding gained in this study provides insights into the potential benefits and limitations of using CNTs in lubrication.
