November 2023

Conference Paper

Uncertainty Quantification of Metal Additive Manufacturing Processing Conditions Through the use of Exascale Computing

By:
Carson, Robert; Rolchigo, Matthew R; Coleman, John S; Titov, Mikhail; Belak, James; Bement, Matthew T
Page Number:
380-383
Issue Number:
N/A
Book Title:
SC-W '23: Proceedings of the SC '23 Workshops of The International Conference on High Performance Computing, Network, Storage, and Analysis
Publication Date:
November 2023
Publisher Location:
Association for Computing Machinery, New York, New York, United States of America
Conference Name:
SC '23 Workshops of The International Conference on High Performance Computing, Network, Storage, and Analysis
Conference Location:
Denver, Colorado, United States of America
Conference Sponsor:
Sighpc, The IEEE Computer Society Technical Community on High Performance Computing
View DOI Listing:
https://doi.org/10.1145/3624062.3624103

Abstract

Metal additive manufacturing (AM) is a disruptive manufacturing technology that opens the design space for parts outside those possible from traditional manufacturing methods. In order to accelerate industry and R&D needs to certify AM parts, the Exascale Additive Manufacturing project (ExaAM) has developed a suite of exascale-ready computational tools to model the process-to-structure-to-properties (PSP) relationship for additively manufactured metal components. One such tool is an uncertainty quantification (UQ) pipeline to quantify the effect that uncertainty in processing conditions has on local mechanical responses. We present an overview of this pipeline and its required simulation and workflow codes. Using the Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s (ORNL) exascale computer, Frontier, we utilize this pipeline to cross multiple length and time scales to predict the local mechanical response of a location within a complex AM bridge part, AMB2018-01 produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) as part of their 2018 AM-Bench test series. Our results are then compared to experimental mechanical tests of parts from the NIST build to quantify the error in the ExaAM UQ workflow.