Abstract
The molecular orbital picture plays a fundamental role in analyzing and interpreting the electronic structure of atoms and molecules. Evaluation of molecular orbitals obtained from the Hartree–Fock method and other one-electron Hamiltonian models is routine for quantum-chemical studies. Although these analyses have proven to be useful for identifying different patterns in electronic structure and reactivity, in many cases, the chosen set of orbitals do not incorporate many of the fundamental electron correlation effects needed to accurately describe the atom or molecule under study. This work addresses the question of whether or not the inclusion of electron correlation is essential for the orbital picture by contrasting the differences between canonical Hartree–Fock orbitals and the correlated, normalized Dyson orbitals.
