March 2026

Conference Paper

Material Model Parameters Optimization in Liquid Mercury Target Dynamics Simulation With Machine Learning Surrogates

By:
Lin, Lianshan ; Tran, Hoang A; Radaideh, Majdi; Gorti, Sarma B; Simunovic, Srdjan ; Jiang, Hao ; Winder, Drew E; Cousineau, Sarah Mariehelen
Page Number:
1-7
Volume:
11
Book Title:
Proceedings of the ASME 2023 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
Publication Date:
March 2026
Publisher Location:
ASME, New York, United States of America
Conference Name:
International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (IMECE)
Conference Location:
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America
Conference Sponsor:
MathWorks, The Virginia Tech Department of Mechanical
View DOI Listing:
https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2023-113604

Abstract

A pulsed spallation target is subjected to very short (∼0.7μs) but intense loads (23.3 kJ) from repeated proton pulses, which knock away neutrons from the mercury atoms’ nuclei for a wide range application in physics, engineering, medicine, petroleum exploration, biology, chemistry, etc. The effect of this pulsed loading on the stainless-steel target module which contains the flowing mercury target material is difficult to predict not only due to its short but intense explosive-like physical reaction, but also the nonlinear material behavior of the liquid mercury in the structure. Injecting small helium bubbles in the mercury has been an efficient method of mitigating the pressure wave at high power level stage. However, prediction of the resultant loading on the target is more difficult when helium gas is intentionally injected into the mercury. A 2-phase material model that incorporates the Rayleigh-Plesset (R-P) model is expected to address this complex multi-physics dynamics problem by including the bubble dynamics in the liquid mercury. A parameter sensitivity study was firstly employed to understand their impact on the simulation strains. The investigated parameters included E, μ, γ, σ, n, VFgas, and gas cumulative volume curve control parameters a and b. Verification and validation results from sparse polynomial expansions (SPE) method and directional Gaussian smoothing (DGS) optimization show that the surrogate model had training error of ∼7% and validation error of ∼15%, indicating that machine learning methods and surrogate models can help optimize the uncertain parameters in the complex 2-phase material model. This approach is expected to fill the knowledge gap between unknown liquid-gas mixture material model and measured vessel strain responses.