Carbon clusters have been the subject of research for
decades. [137] However, the discovery of the
fullerene structure of
,[138]
(figure 8.1) led to a renewal and subsequent explosion of
interest in the properties of the clusters. An
understanding of the physical and chemical properties of these
clusters is important for a large variety of systems; they have a role
in the chemistry of comets, carbon stars and molecular clouds
(References 2-9 in [139]), and their properties are
important in chemical vapour deposition processes such as the growth
of diamond, silicon carbide and carbon nitride thin films.
The discovery of the fullerenes, defined as a closed cage structures containing only pentagonal and hexagonal faces, [140] has subsequently generated a substantial body of research dedicated to their structure and molecular properties. Fullerene clusters may now be produced in macroscopic quantities, although structure and mass selection still remains something of an art. A rich variety of physical and chemical properties has been demonstrated, but despite many experimental and theoretical advances the detailed energetics of these systems are not yet fully understood. The question ``which is the smallest stable fullerene?'' remains both interesting and contentious due to the sensitivity of cluster formation to experimental conditions and the challenges posed to accurate theoretical methods by system size.
A 20 atom cluster is the smallest geometrically able to form a
fullerene. [140] However, the smallest stable
fullerenes most commonly identified in experiments are the
and
clusters. [141,142,143]
The sizes and types of cluster are usually identified experimentally
by mass spectrometry and time of flight measurements. Under typical
experimental conditions, rings are found to dominate up to
approximately 28 carbon atoms (see for example,
Ref. [142]), while for clusters of more than 28
atoms, fullerenes are mostly observed, although rings continue to be
present. Figure 8.2 illustrates the influence of
experimental conditions on relative cluster abundance.
|