Abstract: Two rural Pennsylvania single-family residences in a 6,000 heating degree-day climate
were retrofitted with add-on groundwater-source heat pumps. Performance data were collected over a two
year period. Data were collected manually and by microcomputer, and included weather, energy use of the heat pump
and house, water flow and temperature.
Compared to oil, at 1984 prices, a payback of 4 to 6 years is possible. One unit operated at a COP in heating
of nearly 3.0, including an allowance for pumping energy. The COP of the second unit was lower, still
better than oil heating but not cost-effective at today's rates. Some initial reliability problems were also
encountered with one unit. This emphasizes the need for astute buying and use of comparative ratings on models
at conditions consistent with the application. As water-source heat pump performance is affected by water
supply temperatures, the rating must be for temperatures similar to groundwater temperatures in the region where
the heat pump will be installed, typically 50 to 55 F in Pennsylvania. A substantial quantity of water is required
and proper disposal is a consideration. Ponds were used to receive processed water in both test applications.
The source groundwater was obtained from wells of more than 50 feet in depth, which are common at rural residences.
The units tested required no signicant supplemental heat. Although oversizing may effect performance slightly,
undersizing the unit would increase supplemental heat usage. The resulting aggregated demand on a winter-peaking utility
could be deleterious. A properly-sized groundwater heat pump should have a load profile similar to resistance heat.
Keywords: water source heat pump, ground coupled heat pump, geothermal heat pump, energy efficiency
Availability:
National Technology Information Service
U.S. Department of Commerce
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield, Virginia 22161
view or download report
|