To meet the government's new energy standard for refrigerators a 30% reduction for units manufactured after July 2001 ORNL researchers have designed and demonstrated a "fridge of the future" that uses half as much energy as today's refrigerator-freezers (RFs) and one-fifth as much as 1972 models: the 1 kilowatt-hour per day refrigerator.
In a cooperative research and development agreement (CRADA) with the Appliance Research Consortium (ARC), a subsidiary of the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers, researchers adapted a standard 1996 baseline 20-ft3 RF cabinet (shown as unit A in the table below) by adding various features that would improve energy efficiency.
The changes involved
These improvements, shown as unit C in the table below, cut power consumption to 0.93 kWh/day, a performance that exceeds the 2001 energy standard and that would save $6.5 billion annually if all the 125 million RFs in the U.S. operated as efficiently.
Because the addition of vacuum insulation panels results in a significant cost increase to RF units, researchers also tested the unit without the vacuum insulation. This modified unit (unit B in the table) would still be about 44% more efficient than the 1993 standard and would save $4.5 billion annually in the United States.
| Refrigerator/ freezer |
Energy consumption (kWh/d) |
% run time* |
Manufacturer cost increase ($) |
Simple payback time (years) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Baseline unit | 1.68 | 44.2 | | |
| B | Unit A with 2-in.-thick doors, high-efficiency compressor, low-wattage condenser fan, and adaptive defrost scheme | 1.16 | 47.6 | 53.38 | 6.6 |
| C | Unit B with vacuum insulation around freezer section and larger evaporator | 0.93 | 36.5 | 134.33 | 11.4 |
| *Percentage of time compressor runs each hour. | |||||
The minimum energy use achieved by unit C, 0.93 kilowatt-hours
per day (kWh/d), is 45% lower than the energy use of the baseline
unit and 54% lower than the DOE-mandated maximum of 2.01 kWh/d
for this size of RF. Estimated manufacturing costs increased by
$134 for this system, resulting in an 11.4 year simple payback,
assuming the consumer's cost is twice the manufacturer's cost.
Prototype B achieved a minimum energy use of 1.16 kWh/d, with an
estimated manufacturing cost increase of $53 and a simple payback
of 6.6 years.
Back to Appliance
R&D Page
BTC Home Page
U.S. Department of Energy