Richard Archer <rha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I would argue that netqmail is not sufficiently patched, though
it is a good base from which to begin applying more patches.
I currently apply a further 14 patches to the netqmail code,
one of which is a custom compilation of 3 conflicting patches.
I agree. Netqmail has always been very minimal. We're thinking about a
branch that incorporates the most frequently necessary patches. If we
do that, though, it's not not going to be an everything-but-the-
kitchen-sink distribution, it's going to be a careful assembly of
heavily scrutinized patches that add the minimal code, complexity, and
security risk necessary to do the job.