[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: qmail is officially public domain. have at it lads!

To: qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: qmail is officially public domain. have at it lads!
From: Robert - elists <lists07@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 22:39:32 -0800
Delivered-to: de5-qmail@sws5.ornl.gov
Delivered-to: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to
In-reply-to: <20071207025613.ED21850D4@coma.plastik.us>
Mailing-list: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
References: <474FCB20.6030209@ias.com.hk> <474FDD0D.3040901@developersdesk.com> <20071207025613.ED21850D4@coma.plastik.us>
Thread-index: Acg4gYhg7gOULqRgSqKfZ7Zl3uzqTwAGa7Ug

As far as greylisting

http://qmail.jms1.net/scripts/jgreylist.shtml

JMS did some excellent work IOHO

preference has been given to the earlier implementation (in perl) if I
recall.

Nobody here has stepped out with the C version yet, although I know there
are folks using it.

As far as Greetdelay, I am confused...

I seem to recall that it wasn't RFC compliant...

Anyone care to productively expand on that idea?

 - rh

Follow-Ups:
- Re: qmail is officially public domain. have at it lads!
  - From: Hugo Monteiro

References:
- Re: qmail is officially public domain. have at it lads!
  - From: Zachery Hostens

Prev by Date: Opinions on qmail-spp patch please.
Next by Date: Re: qmail is officially public domain. have at it lads!
Previous by thread: Re: qmail is officially public domain. have at it lads!
Next by thread: Re: qmail is officially public domain. have at it lads!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread