[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: qmail is officially public domain. have at it lads!

To: qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: qmail is officially public domain. have at it lads!
From: Kyle Wheeler <kyle-qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:12:43 -0600
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/
Delivered-to: de5-qmail@sws5.ornl.gov
Delivered-to: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=memoryhole.net; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns/txt; s=default; bh=2nWbh07guhBOVOWafqd+OrkWOGo=; b=SDjSM93EoRbXAEkv0SdzMbmaNhL1/sWy5hfgyZZiF7m6jKEIo2jqZkLXmk6bjfOJ+Bn085joYmEl2tcTQU1p6PoNKlK0YwHBiSx88sbejsjqcoFYwkBcX5k/veugX7lwA4FAnQeX0RRINvcT2FXl2VHhNc8HT9LVNWCRcM3i7cY=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=memoryhole.net; b=HTKRUbKB6KGyNOdhWncs/8rV/9OAboVSXkhb8QxAn2jtJv1lbuXHFlfH1Aqa7lv4++hZfiferyRXNtn7VhIATDig8XArdoH5P9ipqL2FB9Ox0Jg8aML/S1YHzeZDW6XSX4YBHcqZmMQL40PL8J779ySpkT3Xn9XtrPmg4rb8V28=; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent;
In-reply-to: <20071206200738.GA27575@mcmilk.de>
Mail-followup-to: qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Mailing-list: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
References: <474FC5C0.4020009@developersdesk.com> <474FCB20.6030209@ias.com.hk> <474FDD0D.3040901@developersdesk.com> <EECA47AF-60C7-4434-AFB5-5DFC74B06AA4@doeshosting.com> <18260.24472.71079.532644@sws5.ornl.gov> <20071203201633.GB14495@firstmagic.com> <18260.26561.668159.810743@sws5.ornl.gov> <4754745E.1090101@tenebras.com> <3.0.6.32.20071204223353.010f1c50@192.168.192.1> <20071206200738.GA27575@mcmilk.de>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-21)

On Thursday, December 6 at 09:07 PM, quoth Tino Reichardt:

Whats lacking in qmail (from my persective):

1. Uniform (+high speed) user verification at any level (SMTP/POP3/IMPA4).
2. Propper AUTH implementation.
3. Propper SSL for qmail-remote.

And DKIM.

What do you mean? qmail lacks DKIM support in the same way that qmail lacks DNSRBL support, which is to say that it's trivial to provide the support via wrappers. For DNSRBL support, you use rblsmtpd (or something similar). For DKIM support, you can use the scripts that I provide on my website (http://www.memoryhole.net/qmail/).

~Kyle
--
Compassion is the basis of morality.
                                                -- Arnold Schopenhauer

Attachment: pgp00001.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- Re: qmail is officially public domain. have at it lads!
  - From: Dave Sill
- Re: qmail is officially public domain. have at it lads!
  - From: J. Scott Dorr
- Re: qmail is officially public domain. have at it lads!
  - From: Dave Sill
- Re: qmail is officially public domain. have at it lads!
  - From: Michael Sierchio
- Re: qmail is officially public domain. have at it lads!
  - From: Erwin Hoffmann
- Re: qmail is officially public domain. have at it lads!
  - From: Tino Reichardt

Prev by Date: Re: qmail is officially public domain. have at it lads!
Next by Date: Re: qmail is officially public domain. have at it lads!
Previous by thread: Re: qmail is officially public domain. have at it lads!
Next by thread: Re: qmail is officially public domain. have at it lads!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread