[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question on encrypted messages
- To: qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Question on encrypted messages
- From: Tony Mobily <mobily@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 16:50:11 +0200
- Delivered-to: de5-qmail@sws5.ornl.gov
- Delivered-to: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to
- Mailing-list: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
> > Assuming that I have the encryption/decryption programs ready, how
hard would it be to implement such a
> >system using qmail? Has anybody here done this already?
>Why would you want that?
>If I read everything you want correct it will not add extra security
only CPU power.
>The public and private keys will be stored on the same server so a
breakin on the server will reveal both.
>If you wanted to let the pop3 client to decrypt the files why don't
you install ssl?
The user's private keys would be stored on the server, yes, but they
would be encrypted symmetrically using a passphrase.
So, if it did happen that somebody broke into the server, or stole the
hard drive, s/he wouldn't be able to access the local email as it would
all be encrypted - and the private keys would be useless without the
passphrases to unencrypt them.
So, the system still makes a bit of sense - I think.
It is still true that a hacker with root access to the system could put
a backdoor in the Webmail system, but encrypting stuff would certainly
help (and you can always do specific audit from external hosts to make
sure that the webmail's MD5 isn't changed, for example).
Bye,
Merc.