[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: silly qmail syndrome
- Subject: Re: silly qmail syndrome
- From: Christopher Chan <feizhou@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:18:04 +0800
- Cc: qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: de5-qmail@sws5.ornl.gov
- Delivered-to: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to
- In-reply-to: <3311.192.168.1.12.1078022227.squirrel@mail.nerdworks.org>
- Mailing-list: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
- References: <20040228101827.80486.qmail@web20211.mail.yahoo.com> <4040C62A.7020105@graffiti.net> <3311.192.168.1.12.1078022227.squirrel@mail.nerdworks.org>
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040208)
Is 1+0 better then 0+1?
I thought 0+1 was better for I/O intensive tasks. Please correct me if I am
wrong.
http://www.raid.com/04_01_0p1_flash.html
I think stripping mirrors is better than mirroring stripes.
The 3ware cards do it that way.
Think about it. What happens when one disk goes down?