[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tarpitting?

To: qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Tarpitting?
From: Gerrit Pape <pape@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 12:54:25 +0100
Delivered-to: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to
In-reply-to: <87fzh5rt6z.fsf@loki.odinnet>
Mail-followup-to: qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Mailing-list: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
References: <20031103215630.GO8777@flounder.net> <87fzh5rt6z.fsf@loki.odinnet>
Resent-date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 07:20:03 -0500 (EST)
Sender: de5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 05:19:32PM -0500, Erik Bourget wrote:
> I know that there are patches to tcpserver to limit per IP; are there per
> subnet?  I'd rather do the matching at tcpserver than at iptables because it's
> meant to be centrally modified from another machine and propagated out to the
> frontend MXs; remotely/automatically modifying firewall rules makes me upset.

Take a look at the ipsvd package if you're interested.  It implements a
tcpserver alike service daemon with extended instructions for connection
handling, including per-host/ip/subnet concurrency.

Regards, Gerrit.
-- 
Open projects at http://smarden.org/pape/.

References:
- Re: Tarpitting?
  - From: Erik Bourget

Prev by Date: reg::: blocking messages from a perticular SMTP
Next by Date: Re: netqmail-1.04
Previous by thread: Re: Tarpitting?
Next by thread: Re: Tarpitting?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread