Re: Qmail and pine 3.95?

To: Stacey Brown <sbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Qmail and pine 3.95?
From: Alan Thew <Alan.Thew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 11:27:02 +0100 (BST)
cc: djb-qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-To: djb-qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960829030832.13165A-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: The University of Liverpool

pine has been using the -bs option for sometimes (even real sendmail
complains :-) ). What's wrong with using the smtp port?

The tech-notes say that pine 3.xx (where xx > 91):

NOTE: The program MUST read the message
          to be posted on standard input, AND operate in the style of
          sendmail's "-t" option.

--
Alan Thew
alan.thew@xxxxxxxxx   ...!uknet!liv!alan.thew   Tel: +44 151 794-4497
University of Liverpool, Computing Services     Fax: +44 151 794-4442

On Thu, 29 Aug 1996, Stacey Brown wrote:

> Hi, I can't seem to get pine 3.95 (Worked with 3.91) to enjoy using
> qmail's sendmail program.  I figure this is good FAQ material, but I
> couldn't find one :)  When trying to send a message using pine 3.95, it
> will segfault if it's using the qmail sendmail program.  (Remote smtp and
> setting the smtp to your own domain work fine).  I replaced the sendmail 
> program with a bash script and found that it was the "-bs" option pine 
> 3.95 tries to pass to qmail's sendmail that causes it to segfault.  I 
> replaced the options from pine 3.91, and now pine doesn't segfault, but 
> it'll just sit there...  It seems to not be closing the connection to 
> qmail's sendmail.  Does anyone know of a way to fix pine/qmail to get it 
> working?  I appriciate any help, thanks!
> 
>

Follow-Ups:

Re: Qmail and pine 3.95?

From: Stacey Brown <sbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

References:

Qmail and pine 3.95?

From: Stacey Brown <sbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>