|
Reference Documents Cleaner and Greener
Researchers combine technologies to increase automotive fuel efficiency.
Spinning wheels on a "chassis dynamometer" treadmill,
Larry Moore "drives" a 2007 Swedish car that runs in place
on an alternative fuel. While conducting an emissions
study at the National Transportation Research Center located
between Oak Ridge and Knoxville, Tenn., he intently watches a
laptop screen outside the windshield, as if playing a computer
game. This flex-fuel vehicle (FFV) is highly instrumented and,
under the hood, resembles a patient having heart surgery.
|

This Saab BioPower flex-fuel car that ORNL imported from Sweden was first driven on a Maryville, Ohio, track to break it in for ORNL's
emissions studies.
|
The Saab 9-5 BioPower car project at NTRC was highlighted in
a speech given by Alexander Karsner, U.S. Department of Energy
Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy at
the Washington, D.C., Auto Show 2007 in January. Karsner recognized
Oak Ridge National Laboratory's important research to
understand the potential performance and fuel economy gains of
FFVs. The BioPower, now on the market in Europe but not available
in the United States, is the first FFV optimized for ethanol.
Because ethanol has lower energy content than gasoline, tank
mileage of typical FFVs drops by 30% when they run on E85, a
blend that is 15% gasoline and 85% ethanol. While FFVs sold in the
United States are optimized for gasoline and are largely "ethanol
tolerant," Saab stresses that the BioPower is optimized for ethanol
use, produces more power on E85 than on gasoline and does not
lose as much tank mileage as American FFVs, which are being
improved to help address President George Bush's ambitious goal of
reducing America's gasoline consumption by 20% in 10 years.
"My hat's off to Saab," says Brian West, a researcher with
ORNL's Fuels, Engines and Emissions Research Center (FEERC)
at NTRC who collects and evaluates data on the car's performance.
"The BioPower is very clean on both fuels—gasoline and
ethanol. Saab engineers did not sacrifice fuel economy or emissions
to get the added performance from ethanol. This finding
is important because while U.S.-legal FFVs are emissions certified on both gasoline and E85, the European regulations do not
require certification on E85. We really did not know how clean
the Saab would be on E85."
The Saab BioPower produces 180 horsepower with ethanol but
only 150 horsepower with gasoline. According to West, by accelerating
from 40 to 70 miles per hour in third gear, the car using
E85 would be two seconds faster than the same model fueled by
gasoline. In practical terms, this difference puts the gasoline car
almost two car lengths behind on a 500-foot freeway on ramp.
"The improvement provides a clear incentive for people to
choose ethanol over gasoline as the fuel for this car," FEERC
Director Ron Graves says, noting that about 10% of the gasoline
sold in the United States is premium gasoline even though many
cars filled with this more expensive fuel do not need it. "Some
people will pay extra for a perceived or real performance benefit."
Graves says that engineers hope to exploit ethanol's desirable
properties—higher octane number and latent heat of
vaporization—to improve tank mileage of ethanol cars like the
Saab BioPower.
Clean diesel engines
Under the U.S. Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles
(PNGV) program in the 1990s, the goal of the Big Three U.S. auto
manufacturers, with support of DOE's national laboratories, was
to demonstrate clean, efficient vehicles. The program envisioned
combining an electric motor with a diesel engine to make a
hybrid, family-sized sedan that could achieve 80 miles per gallon.
The diesel engine uses at least 30% less petroleum-derived fuel per
mile than today's internal combustion gasoline engines.
PNGV evolved into the FreedomCAR and Fuel Partnership,
which emphasizes developing, instead of a specific vehicle, technologies
from which automakers can choose. The FreedomCAR
and Vehicle Technologies program funds research at ORNL and
other labs to remove technical barriers that limit the use of
these technologies.
The diesel engine, because of its fuel efficiency, continues to be
of great interest to automakers. About half of the new cars sold in
Europe have diesel engines. In the United States the main technical
barrier to market penetration of diesel engines in light-duty
vehicles such as sport utility vehicles, vans and sedans, has been
the inability of this technology to meet Environmental Protection
Agency emissions standards. The primary obstacles are nitrogen
oxides (NOx), which contribute to acid rain and smog, and
particulate matter, which threatens respiratory health.
The most elegant exhaust treatment method for diesel
engines is the lean NOx trap (LNT), an absorber-based exhaust
aftertreatment system that stores NOx as nitrates during lean
operation. The NOx is stripped off and chemically reduced when the engine transitions periodically to a brief, rich combustion
mode. The problem is that sulfur in diesel fuel exhaust occupies
the NOx storage sites, rendering the aftertreatment ineffective.
The partial solution was a recent ruling by EPA that requires oil
refineries to reduce the concentration of sulfur in diesel fuel from
500 parts per million to 15 ppm. Despite lower sulfur in the fuel,
LNTs still suffer from sulfur poisoning, so research is focused on
mitigating this problem.
EPA's ruling cited data contributed by ORNL researchers. In
1999 West and Scott Sluder conducted transient driving experiments
using a Mercedes A170 vehicle they equipped with a
prototype LNT.
"We were the first to conduct a laboratory experiment to
demonstrate the potential of LNT and other aftertreatment
technologies to enable a diesel car to meet Tier 2 emissions standards,"
West says. "We demonstrated that the LNT helped lower
NOx levels, and that the diesel particle filter effectively removed
particulate matter. Using diesel fuel with different levels of sulfur,
we also quantified the harmful effect of sulfur on catalysts and
tailpipe emissions."
Assisting industry
The Dodge Ram rolled out at a 2007 auto show by Daimler
Chrysler has a Cummins 6.7-liter diesel engine and NOx aftertreatment
system that bear the marks of ORNL research. John
Wall, vice president and chief technical officer of Cummins Inc.,
noted in a letter to ORNL's Bill Partridge "the significant contribution
you and your FEERC colleagues have made to the research
required to introduce this vehicle. The knowledge and tools developed
in our cooperative research and development agreement
were critical to the R&D efforts that culminated in the release of
an aftertreatment technology that meets the 2010 environmental
standards in 2007."
Wall credited the mass spectrometer system, called SpaciMS,
and pioneered by Partridge, for "changing the way we think
about tuning engine combustion." He added that this instrument
and "the fluorescence lifetime thermometer your team developed
helped us understand the changes in NOx adsorber catalysts as
they aged, critical information for catalyst system design."
Wall also lauded Tom Watkins and colleagues at ORNL's
High Temperature Materials Laboratory, who used computer
modeling and images produced by the aberration-corrected
scanning transmission electron microscope to predict the
lifetime of catalysts and particulate filters, such as Corning's
honeycomb-like cordierite material, used for diesel exhaust
aftertreatment. Durability of aftertreatment technology is an
issue because truck drivers expect these systems to last for half a
million miles. One study showed that rhenium particles become
less catalytically active when they coalesce into nano-sized
"rafts" after exposure to diesel exhaust.
Another effective emissions control strategy for diesel engines
is exhaust gas recirculation, a process in which a carefully
controlled amount of combustion by-products is mixed with the
incoming air. "Basically, the exhaust of fuel you burn is dumped
back into the cylinder," says researcher Johney Green. "Exhaust
gas recirculation reduces the temperature in the cylinder, resulting
in less production of NOx. One challenge we must resolve is that
this strategy actually produces more soot until a critical threshold
is crossed, resulting in the simultaneous reduction of NOx and
particulate matter emissions."
In May 2002 ORNL became the first DOE lab to publicize
the discovery of low-temperature diesel combustion. The muted
reaction at a Department of Energy program review meeting
made ORNL researchers suspect that some automakers and diesel
engine manufacturers may have known about the phenomenon
but for competitive reasons chose to downplay their reaction.
"Getting this discovery out in the open has helped the
diesel engine community move forward faster now that engineers
are working on the problem in a noncompetitive way,"
Green says. ORNL's presentations, he adds, helped redirect
the DOE diesel engine portfolio toward increased research on
controlling and stabilizing what the agency terms "high-efficiency
clean combustion."
Meanwhile, across the ORNL campus various groups are
analyzing alternative fuels and materials for engines. Nuclear
Science and Technology Division researchers are developing
computer simulations of combustion of biofuels, such as B5, diesel
fuel containing 5% biodiesel made from soybean oil. The Materials
Science and Technology Division is seeking to improve the
thermal efficiency of heavy-duty diesel engines in trucks, ranging
from tractor trailers to large pickup trucks. Thermal efficiency is the percentage of a fuel's heat energy value that is converted to
mechanical energy to power a diesel engine.
Program manager Ray Johnson says, "In 2006, 150-horsepower
diesel engines for passenger cars had a 41.5% thermal
efficiency whereas 400-horsepower diesel engines for trucks had a
45% thermal efficiency. The DOE thermal efficiency goals are 45%
by 2010 for diesel cars and 55% by 2012 for trucks. With widespread
implementation of new improvements, we could realize a
fuel reduction of 20%."
Engine designers working for Cummins, Caterpillar and
Detroit Diesel say they cannot achieve these goals without
stronger, lighter, higher-temperature, lower-friction materials
that ORNL researchers can characterize, synthesize and model. In a new cooperative program involving an industrial partner,
advanced materials and components will be tested in a state-ofthe-
art, heavy-duty diesel engine, allowing researchers to measure
the durability of new, advanced materials tested in the engine
and also the effects of new materials and components on the
engine's performance and efficiency. This initiative builds on a
current project in which ceramic and intermetallic valves were
tested for hundreds of hours in a stationary natural gas engine
and found to be more durable and corrosion-resistant than the
standard steel valves.
Capturing waste heat
More than half of the energy value of fuel in current automobile
engines is lost to the atmosphere as waste heat. DOE's
Solid State Energy Conversion Technology Program is developing
technology using thermoelectric modules for waste heat recovery
in vehicles to improve thermal efficiency and engine performance. Such a system based on temperature differences not only could
convert waste heat directly to electricity to operate the car's electrical
accessories, such as pumps and compressors, but also could
provide heating and cooling directly. However, the poor efficiency
of current thermoelectric materials is a significant barrier to large-scale
commercialization.
DOE has asked ORNL to lead a new, computational quantum
theory-driven effort to develop practical, high-efficiency thermoelectric
materials that would enable commercialization of automotive
thermoelectric generators and greater market penetration
of solid-state heating and cooling.
Should the initiative result in significant commercialization
of thermoelectric modules with a modest 10% efficiency,
the impact on America's fuel consumption, and the resulting
impacts on security and the environment, would be of enormous
and lasting value.—Carolyn Krause

|