[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: spamcop


On Mar 2, 2005, at 11:27 AM, Charles Cazabon wrote:

Markus Stumpf <maex-qmail@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There are still thousands of systems like those that act as gateways
and cannot clear the recipient during the SMTP conversation.
According to spamcop they are all evil spammers that have to be blocked.

There are also, of course, other valid reasons why messages can end up
bouncing after a successful SMTP DATA command is acknowledged. Spamcop is
ignorant of those reasons as well.

For me spamcop maintains a broken DNSBL and I can recommend anyone
that likes to run a stable mail system not to use their blacklist.

Seconded. Motion carried.

Charles


Thirded (Not a word, according to spell check). I had to get a new set of IPs because a year earlier some spammer had abused them. You would think they would clean up their stuff after a year of not being used. So we were blocked until i got a new range.

Jan-Willem Regeer
----
This message is authored under the license which can be found at http://x-istence.com/LICENSE

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature