[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: OT: Courier vs Binc ?

Subject: Re: OT: Courier vs Binc ?
From: Jan-Willem Regeer <xistence@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:20:16 -0500
Cc: qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: de5-qmail@sws5.ornl.gov
Delivered-to: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to
In-reply-to: <20050302174623.22672.qmail@xuxa.iecc.com>
Mailing-list: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
References: <20050302174623.22672.qmail@xuxa.iecc.com>

On Mar 2, 2005, at 12:46 PM, John Levine wrote:

How is binc compared with courier? Experiences?


What versions of binc are people using?  I still haven't been able
to get it to work properly on my BSD/OS system.

I suppose I should try it on my spare FreeBSD box to see if it's an
OK issue.

I compile mine from the FreeBSD ports tree, never had a problem.

Jan-Willem Regeer ---- This message is authored under the license which can be found at http://x-istence.com/LICENSE

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

References:
- Re: OT: Courier vs Binc ?
  - From: John Levine

Prev by Date: Re: OT: Courier vs Binc ?
Next by Date: Username in log from qmail-pop3d
Previous by thread: Re: OT: Courier vs Binc ?
Next by thread: Re: OT: Courier vs Binc ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread