Re: OT: Courier vs Binc ?

To: qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: OT: Courier vs Binc ?
From: Felix von Leitner <felix-qmail@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 11:29:59 +0100
Delivered-to: de5-qmail@sws5.ornl.gov
Delivered-to: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to
In-reply-to: <924f2928050301184054a7049d@mail.gmail.com>
Mail-followup-to: qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Mailing-list: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
References: <35333.201.139.0.190.1109728313.squirrel@linux.unam.mx> <924f2928050301184054a7049d@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i

Thus spake Jason Frisvold (xenophage0@xxxxxxxxx):
> I much prefer binc over courier.

I'm quite happy with dovecot (dovecot.org).

Felix

References:
- OT: Courier vs Binc ?
  - From: asierra
- Re: OT: Courier vs Binc ?
  - From: Jason Frisvold