[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: To supervise or to not supervise?

To: Ken Jones <kbo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: To supervise or to not supervise?
From: prj@xxxxxxxxxxx (Paul Jarc)
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:19:17 -0500
Cc: qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: de5-qmail@sws5.ornl.gov
Delivered-to: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to
In-reply-to: <200503021754.12371.kbo@inter7.com>
Mail-copies-to: nobody
Mailing-list: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
Organization: What did you have in mind? A short, blunt, human pyramid?
References: <202DB470B8484B469E8B4302E44A71390CA26B27@mail.ourvacationstore.com> <200503021754.12371.kbo@inter7.com>
User-agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)

Ken Jones <kbo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> To simplify killing different tcpservers, we wrote a patch to tcpserver
> that lets you write a pid file. The new option is -w /path/to/pidfile.

No need for a patch.
sh -c 'echo $$ > pidfile; exec tcpserver ...'


paul

References:
- To supervise or to not supervise?
  - From: Patrick Campbell
- Re: To supervise or to not supervise?
  - From: Ken Jones

Prev by Date: Re: To supervise or to not supervise?
Next by Date: Re: To supervise or to not supervise?
Previous by thread: Re: To supervise or to not supervise?
Next by thread: Re: To supervise or to not supervise?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread