[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: netqmail-1.04



Fabien Mounier <fmounier@xxxxxxx> wrote:
 > However, I would be extremely happy, if for example the instigators
 of netqmail would take their initiative one step further and perhaps
 setup a CVS, where a 1.1 (or whatever version-number seems fit)
 unstable branch would live
Charles Cazabon replied:
No need.  netqmail will /never/ be "unstable", so there will never be an
unstable branch, and it will not change often enough, if ever, to need a CVS
repository.

I might have mis-worded my posting.
netqmail is a very Good Thing (tm) in itself and I perfectly understand why you did not include anything beyond the strict necessary.


What I am suggesting is, CVS or not, to go one step further and include a select subset of the various patches that do useful things without breaking anything else.
The unfortunate word "unstable" was meant by me in contrast to "armor-plated" like djb's original code, not in the sense "let's throw together some sloppy patches and see qmail break".


Die-hard qmail-admins would happily continue to do patching of their own, but for newcomer-postmasters (I am not talking about clueless postmasters, but about repenting converts from other MTA-religions), it would be less troublesome to get hold of a qmail-version that would fit their needs right out of the box.

I do not wish to stirr up a flamewar about licensing issues and I am aware of the discussion about it, however I strongly believe that there must be sensible ways to coordinate the patching effort.

I know that there is some if-you're-too-dense-to-grok-djb's-telegraphic-doc-shoot-yourself-and-get-lost-attitude on this list. While I can understand that getting to see luser-questions over and over again is annoying, I am fairly convinced that lessening the amount of source-code-patching required for mildly complex installations could broaden qmails count of potential users considerably.

And, still being an optimist, I indulge myself to believe that that would be a Good Thing (tm).

--
Best Regards
Fabien Mounier