[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tuning of qmail-send for max performance possible?

To: qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Tuning of qmail-send for max performance possible?
From: Adrian Ho <aho-djb-qmail@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 21:43:18 +0800
Delivered-to: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to
In-reply-to: <15330.39622.505858.945387@sws5.ctd.ornl.gov>; fromde5@sws5.ctd.ornl.gov on Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 08:08:22AM -0500
Mail-followup-to: qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
References: <D570AA936983D41198FE00B0D03E2929324861@northeastmail.timebridge.com><20011102090613.A22743@svr1.03s.net><15330.39622.505858.945387@sws5.ctd.ornl.gov>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i

On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 08:08:22AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> Mark Delany pointed out that my test was flawed.

Crud, so was mine.  Just did Mark's test on Sol 6 and Linux 2.4, and
they both gave the results you got.

Blows /that/ theory out of the water...

-- 
Adrian Ho    Tinker, Drifter, Fixer, Bum   aho-djb-qmail@03s.net
ListArchive: <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=qmail>
Useful URLs: <http://cr.yp.to/qmail.html> <http://www.qmail.org>
             <http://www.lifewithqmail.org/> <http://qmail.faqts.com/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tuning of qmail-send for max performance possible?
  - From: Mate Wierdl

References:
- RE: Tuning of qmail-send for max performance possible?
  - From: Baetz, Steve
- Re: Tuning of qmail-send for max performance possible?
  - From: Adrian Ho
- Re: Tuning of qmail-send for max performance possible?
  - From: Dave Sill

Prev by Date: Re: qmail-vacation not working
Next by Date: RE: qmail-vacation not working
Prev by thread: Re: Tuning of qmail-send for max performance possible?
Next by thread: Re: Tuning of qmail-send for max performance possible?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread