[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Tuning of qmail-send for max performance possible?
- To: Henning Brauer <lists-qmail@xxxxxxx>, qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: Tuning of qmail-send for max performance possible?
- From: "Baetz, Steve" <Steve.Baetz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 10:24:09 -0500
- Delivered-to: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to
- Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henning Brauer [mailto:lists-qmail@bsws.de]
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 10:00 AM
> To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to
> Subject: Re: Tuning of qmail-send for max performance possible?
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 09:46:33AM -0500, Baetz, Steve wrote:
> > So I'm not sure how an OS that is OPTIMIZED
> > for its own hardware can be a problem.
>
> Slowlaris isn't optimized for anything but Sun's revenue.
>
> > This isn't a discussion to compare OS's with religious
> proportions. I need
> > help with fixing this issue, or I'm going have to go back
> to sendmail, and
> > time is of the essence.
>
> I always gave you the answer. You are running against your
> ressource limits.
> man ulimit.
Henning,
ulimit reports unlimited is available.
Thanks,
Steve Baetz
>
> --
> * Henning Brauer, hostmaster@bsws.de, http://www.bsws.de *
> * BS Web Services, Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany *
> Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the
> simplicity.
> (Dennis Ritchie)
>